By Kim Cape, Rio Texas Annual Conference
In his book, “Loving God with One’s Mind,” Thomas Trotter, former General Secretary of the General Board of Higher Education and Ministry (GBHEM) said, “There are many ways of loving God, some helpful, some problematic. Some love God with their selfless service to neighbor. Some love God by the diligent attention to the care of the things of God. Some love God by blindly following their partial views of God. Some love their views of God more than they love God. Some think loving God means hating those who love God differently. The problem in the world is not that the world is irreligious. It is excessively religious, but the religious spirit is cramped and angular and hostile to the widest angles of God’s love.”
I want to embolden you and ask you to confront some difficult questions as you answer God’s call in your life. Here are three versions of a challenging question – and one encouraging question – that do just that:
One of the biggest learnings of my life was in a Christian Social Ethics class at Perkins School of Theology. It was the Theory of Social Location. What that means is simply, “What you see depends on where you stand.” My social location is a 67-year-old white woman who grew up in small-town Texas. I see the world from that social location. You see the world from your context.
Our call, as we work out our salvation with fear and trembling, is to separate cultural conditioning from the truth of the Gospel. We have to be bigger than small-town Texas or large-city Manila in the Philippines. God loves the world, not only in Texas or the Philippines. What will suffice in a small village in Mozambique may not suffice in the big city of Nairobi, Kenya. It doesn’t mean one is better than the other. It’s just different.
“For God so loved the world…” (John 3:16 NRSV)
Familiarity must not lull us into complacency or cause us to overlook the power of this eloquent summary of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I think it is the measure of us, of our individual faith and of our corporate faith and practice. I think it reminds us that whatever our concept of God, it is too small.
The genius of John Wesley and Methodism is how it has held the tension between law and grace, the sovereignty of God and human free will. Methodists hold together true knowledge and vital piety, head and heart. It did not just rain Bibles one day. Scripture has to be interpreted. Literalism is not the Methodist way. Scripture is not flat. Scripture, tradition, reason and experience is the Methodist way. Scripture is a jewel; it is multifaceted.
After thousands of years sending leaders with words, God knew, my people aren’t hearing my word, they are not getting it. In love with the world, and for the world, God gave his Son, a person. The Word made flesh. Our salvation comes in the person of Jesus Christ. It is in the person of Jesus we know God’s saving love. It is in the person of Jesus we know the way. It is in the person of Jesus we know the truth. It is in the person of Jesus we know the life abundant.
Jesus was both a student and a master of his tradition. He took the Shema, Deuteronomy 6:4-6, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.” (NRSV) And then, Jesus added “MIND.” He took his received tradition and made it bigger. Your finite mind cannot threaten the infinite God. There are no questions too big for God. You don’t have to let your fear stop you.
The Greek word that Jesus uses for mind is dianoia. Trotter says, “This is not having a high IQ, not acing college exams. It means coherence. It means love God by the way you put things together.” This is scary to some people. Scary to the Pharisees who thought they were smarter than everybody else. Scary to the Sadducees who loved to be right more than they loved God. Scary to the lawyers who would rather win an argument than know the truth. Do we fit any of these descriptions?
Intellectual love of God is not in style anywhere in the world. Certainly not in the U.S. where everything’s value is measured by money. Trotter says it is important to remember that Methodism was born in a university. Our founder, John Wesley, always referred to himself as a fellow of Lincoln College, not a pastor. He and the Methodist movement were products of the Enlightenment. A new way of looking at the world, where reason and experience became partners of scripture and tradition.
Ministry in a rapidly changing world like ours requires dianoia – loving God with one’s mind. Loving God with the way we put things together. Loving God with the way we put our world together in the name of the gospel.
I leave you with this encouraging question.
I have a dream for you. That you will be messengers of the Grace of God. That you will lead people out of the darkness into the love of God in Jesus Christ.
Opening the boundaries of our minds requires love and imagination – and courage. Theology in our time will require loving God with our minds. And if we pursue truth long enough, and unflinchingly enough, we will fall at last into the arms of Christ.
Will you commit to serve a church that is big enough for the God who loves the world? I am praying you will.
2019 – Unity in the Church
2018 – Claim Who We Are in Christ
2017 – Bodies, Oppression, and Gospel
2016 – Birthing a Worldwide Church
2015 – Clergywomen Lead Vital Congregations
2014 – Empowerment for All
2013 – What Next?
2012 – What Does the Lord Require of Us?
2011 – See, I am Doing a New Thing
2010 – Voicing Truth With Grace
PDF archive – 1987 to 2009
Subscribe to have new episodes delivered to your mobile device.
WellSprings, A Journal of United Methodist Clergywomen, is published by the Division of Ordained Ministry, General Board of Higher Education and Ministry.
Editor: HiRho Y. Park
Managing Editor: Barbara A. Dick
Editorial Circle: Patricia Bonilla, Neelley Hicks, Anita Phillips, Jacqui Rose-Tucker, Trudy Hawkins Stringer